Bookmark this item

Our Mission

Equipping you for life's journey with Jesus:

Now a team of 60 – we've been serving the Church since 2004
Together we've raised over £1,000,000 for UK Christian charities
25,000 churches are using the Eden Plus account

An Eden team member standing among warehouse book shelves

Philosophical Essays Against Open Theism

Name: Philosophical Essays Against Open Theism
Price: 54.65 GBP
Availability: InStock
Author: Benjamin H. Arbour
ISBN: 9781032094786

by Benjamin H. Arbour

Paperback
226 pages
Publisher: Routledge
15.2 x 22.9 x 2 cm

Today‘s price£54.65

Free UK Delivery

Available - Usually dispatched within 6 days

Buying for a Church or School? Get 10% off every order and Buy Now Pay Later

An Eden warehouse team member picking orders in Chester

Every order is picked and packed with care by our warehouse team in Chester

Bookmark this item

Our Mission

Equipping you for life's journey with Jesus:

Now a team of 60 – we've been serving the Church since 2004
Together we've raised over £1,000,000 for UK Christian charities
25,000 churches are using the Eden Plus account

Free delivery on orders over £10

This new collection of philosophically rigorous essays critiques the interpretation of divine omniscience known as open theism, focusing primarily on philosophically motivated open theism and positing arguments that reject divine knowledge of future contingents in the face of the dilemma of freedom and foreknowledge. The sixteen new essays in this collection, written by some of the most renowned philosophers on the topic of divine providence, represent a philosophical attempt to seriously consider open theism. They cover a wide variety of issues, including: the ontology of time, systematic metaphysics, perfect being theology, the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation, the problem of evil, and the nature of divine knowledge in general. Philosophical Essays Against Open Theism advances the discussion by wrestling against the assertions of open theism, and will be of interest to both proponents and opponents of this controversial issue.