Technological advance continually offers new weapons and resources for combat operations. Subsequently, each technological advance necessitates of review of the current just war theory to ensure the current framework can handle the new technology and that combat is conducted in a manner that complies with the framework. One foreseeable advance in technology that will impact the current just war theory framework is the introduction of autonomous unmanned combat systems. Current human-controlled unmanned system success on the battlefield coupled with rapidly advancing processor technology will fuel the move to increasingly sophisticated autonomous combat vehicles. Additionally, the US Department of Defense has already pledged a several billion dollar investment to advance the research and development necessary to field these systems. This work will examine the rate of change of military technology throughout the centuries to highlight today's rapid development. It will then evaluate the current just war theory framework to see if autonomous weapons systems can comply with the existing framework and suggest areas for further study. The paper will then evaluate the current employment of unmanned systems and the feasibility of truly autonomous weapon systems in combat.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.