Re:CONSIDERING invites you to look at what's familiar from an unfamiliar angle. To consider how we consider things - and how to do it better.

Has our obsession with freedom distracted us from more important things?

Over the past century, freedom has been elevated from a political ideal to a personal mantra. What began as a rallying cry for liberation from tyranny has morphed into a demand for endless personal autonomy. No longer confined to our constitutions, courtrooms or parliaments, freedom now permeates our diets, our shopping carts, our social media feeds. Every inconvenience is a potential violation of our rights; every restriction feels like an affront to our dignity.

But what has this pursuit of absolute limitlessness really brought us? The more we chase freedom from-from constraints, from responsibility, from discomfort-the more we seem to lose our grip on freedom for: for purpose, for others, for the common good.

Despite living in an age of unprecedented choice, modernity has not delivered on its promises. Instead, many find themselves burdened by anxiety, adrift in a sea of options with no compass for ethics, no anchor in morality, no clarity about what it means to live well. We may be freer, but we're not necessarily happier.

Could it be that our current concept of freedom-understood as the absence of all limits-is not true liberation, but a kind of new oppression? One that masquerades as empowerment while leaving us isolated, overwhelmed, and detached from anything larger than ourselves? Have we traded the oppression of external control for the subtler tyranny of infinite choices?

Philosophy, theology and Christianity have long warned that unbounded freedom can become its own kind of cage. True freedom, they argue, is not the ability to do whatever we want, but the ability to choose what is good, even when it's hard. It involves discipline, virtue, and an understanding of our place in the world-not as atomized individuals, but as part of a society, woven together in mutual responsibility.

Perhaps we've misunderstood the nature of limits. Not as barriers to be broken, but as boundaries that create space for meaning. Just as the walls of a home provide shelter, the right kind of restrictions can protect, guide, and even enable a richer form of individualism-one that is grounded in relationship, not self-gratification.

What if freedom is only truly meaningful when tethered to ethics, to morality, to love? What if what we truly seek isn't the removal of all constraints, but the restoration of a vision of the good-a life shaped not by limitless desire, but by deliberate and life-giving choices?

Can a society that's drunk on freedom come back to its senses?

What if freedom is a trap?

And if it is-what can we do to free ourselves from it?