Life giving resources. Faithfully delivered.
FREE delivery on orders over £10
Serving over 2 million Christians in the UK
with Bibles, Books and Church Supplies
Our Buy-Now-Pay-Later accounts used
by over 4,000 UK Churches & Schools
Excellent 4.8 out of 5

Trustpilot

You now have 0 of this item in your basket

Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court

[Paperback]

by Atlanta) Michael J. Perry (emory University

Book Format
Paperback
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Published
December 2010
Weight
341g

Read full description

Click to expand

Today's Price

£27.53

Save 11%

Free UK Delivery

Available - Usually dispatched within 4 days

Buying for a school or church? Upgrade to a FREE Eden Advance Account

Enter the product quantity

Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court

Today's Price £27.53

Frequently Bought Together

Constitutional Rights, Moral Controversy, and the Supreme Court

by Atlanta) Michael J. Perry (emory University

Paperback

The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy

by Atlanta) Michael J. Perry (emory University

Paperback

Add both to basket for £56.95 and save £8.03

Product Description

In this important book, Michael J. Perry examines three of the most disputed constitutional issues of our time: capital punishment, state laws banning abortion, and state policies denying the benefit of law to same-sex unions. The author, a leading constitutional scholar, explains that if a majority of the justices of the Supreme Court believes that a law violates the Constitution, it does not necessarily follow that the Court should rule that the law is unconstitutional. In cases in which it is argued that a law violates the Constitution, the Supreme Court must decide which of two importantly different questions it should address: is the challenged law unconstitutional? Is the lawmakers' judgment that the challenged law is constitutional a reasonable judgment? Perry not only illuminates moral controversies that implicate one or more constitutionally entrenched human rights, but also the fundamental question of the Supreme Court's proper role in adjudicating such controversies.