In "Some Animadversions On Dr. Clark's Scripture-doctrine, (as He Stiles It) Of The Trinity," John Edwards critiques Samuel Clarke's theological interpretations related to the Trinity. This work presents a detailed examination of Clarke's scripture-based arguments, challenging the validity and accuracy of his conclusions.

Edwards scrutinizes Clarke's use of patristic quotations, arguing that they are taken out of context and manipulated to support Clarke's pre-existing beliefs. He also analyzes Clarke's interpretation of specific biblical texts, contending that Clarke 'wrested' them to fit his theological framework. Edwards further challenges the logic and soundness of Clarke's inferences, offering alternative interpretations.

This book offers insights into theological debates surrounding the Trinity during the 18th century and will be of interest to scholars and students of Christian theology, church history, and biblical interpretation.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.