Who is this mystery man?
Is it Paul as a lost man?
Is it Paul as a saved man?

How do we interpret this passage? Do we interpret it through experientialism? Or do we interpret it exegetically based on the context, the grammar, and the details? "It is a small and narrow mind that is afraid to change; it is a sign of greatness that one is prepared to admit at times that one has been mistaken, and that therefore you have had to change your position." -D. Martyn Lloyd Jones In Romans 7: Who Is This Man?, Timothy Klaver challenges our presuppositions and preconceptions, and encourages us to pay careful attention to the context surrounding this passage, as well as to every single detail. Only when we allow Scripture to speak for itself, and stop trying to interpret it through the lens of experientialism, will we do the Scriptures justice. Timothy once again takes the reader by the hand and leads them through Scripture, allowing them to see for themselves what the Bible says. There is no room for experiential interpretation. Every passage of Scripture must be interpreted exegetically based on the surrounding context and the whole counsel of the Word of God.