Life giving resources. Faithfully delivered.
FREE delivery on orders over £10
Serving over 2 million Christians in the UK
with Bibles, Books and Church Supplies
Our Buy-Now-Pay-Later accounts used
by over 4,000 UK Churches & Schools
Excellent 4.8 out of 5

Trustpilot

You now have 0 of this item in your basket

Wittgenstein and Interreligious Disagreement

A Philosophical and Theological Perspective [Hardback]

by Gorazd Andrejc

Author
Gorazd Andrejc
Book Format
Hardback
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan
Published
August 2016

Read full description

Click to expand

Today's Price

£45.06

Save 31%

Free UK Delivery

Available - Usually dispatched within 4 days

Buying for a school or church? Upgrade to a FREE Eden Advance Account

Enter the product quantity

Wittgenstein and Interreligious Disagreement

Today's Price £45.06

Frequently Bought Together

Wittgenstein and Interreligious Disagreement

by Gorazd Andrejc

Hardback

Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts

by James C. Scott

Paperback

Add both to basket for £56.93 and save £25.05

Product Description

This book critically examines three distinct interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein, those of George Lindbeck, David Tracy, and David Burrell, while paying special attention to the topic of interreligious disagreement. In theological and philosophical work on interreligious communication, Ludwig Wittgenstein has been interpreted in very different, sometimes contradicting ways. This is partly due to the nature of Wittgenstein's philosophy, which is not composed of a theory but several, varying conceptions of religion. In this volume, Gorazd Andrejc illustrates how assorted uptakes of Wittgenstein's conceptions of religion, and the differing theological perspectives of the authors who formulated them, shape interpretations of interreligious disagreement and dialogue. Inspired by selected perspectives from Tillichian philosophical theology, this book suggests a new way of engaging both descriptive and normative aspects of Wittgenstein's conceptions of religion in the interpretation of interreligious disagreement.