Midwives lose abortion case

Posted by Simon Cross  ·  Be the first to comment

Two senior midwives have been told that they cannot refuse to supervise the carrying out of abortions, after a Judge rejected their claim that it was a breach of their human rights.

Mary Doogan, 57, and Concepta Wood, 51, supervisory midwives at Glasgow’s Southern General Hospital were given the ruling at the Court of Session in Edinburgh today.

Judge Lady Smith ruled that Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board is not infringing on midwives' human rights by refusing to let them conscientiously object to supervise other midwives involved in carrying out termination procedures.

The Judge said that the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights in relation to freedom of conscience and religion were not absolute.

In her judgement, Lady Smith said the two midwives were not required to have direct involvement in abortions.

 She said: “Nothing they have to do as part of their duties terminates a woman’s pregnancy. They are sufficiently removed from direct involvement as, it seems to me, to afford appropriate respect for and accommodation of their beliefs.”

"Further, they knowingly accepted that these duties were to be part of their job. They can be taken to have known that their professional body, the RCN (Royal College of Nursing), takes the view that the right of conscientious objection is limited and extends only to active participation in the termination."

The court heard that Ms Doogan had been absent from work due to ill health since March 2010 and that Ms Wood had transferred to other work due to the dispute.

Although the women, both Catholics, had made their positions clear early on in their careers, the issue became a problem only in 2007, when abortion procedures began to be carried out in their labour ward.

The health board said it recognised the midwives' right not to participate in abortions under the terms of the Abortion Act.

The ruling could have implications for many other health professionals who exercise the right not to conduct or assist in abortion procedures.

29th February

February 29th, 2012 - Posted & Written by Simon Cross

Thumbs Down0
Thumbs Up0

Did you find this article useful?

0 Visitor Comments

Join in the Eden community and comment on this article

Leave A Comment

Leave your comments or suggestions in regards to this article.

Most Popular Articles
Advent Reflection: 6th December - William Philip
Posted on Tuesday 6th of December
Advent Reflection: 5th December - Compassion
Posted on Monday 5th of December
Advent Reflection: 4th December - Amy Boucher Pye
Posted on Sunday 4th of December
Advent Reflection: 3rd December - Cathy Madavan
Posted on Saturday 3rd of December
Advent Reflection: 2nd December - Gemma Willis
Posted on Friday 2nd of December
Advent Reflection: 6th December - William Philip
Posted on Tuesday 6th of December
Advent Reflection: 5th December - Compassion
Posted on Monday 5th of December
Advent Reflection: 4th December - Amy Boucher Pye
Posted on Sunday 4th of December
Advent Reflection: 3rd December - Cathy Madavan
Posted on Saturday 3rd of December
Advent Reflection: 2nd December - Gemma Willis
Posted on Friday 2nd of December
What Are Eden Bundles?
Posted on Friday 11th of November
Creating an all age, fun, and messy church
Posted on Wednesday 28th of March

Updates from the live @Edencouk twitter feed!

Twitter Seperator
Don't forget to follow us @edencouk
Recent Article Comments
No Comments.

Nia Wright has made 0 posts.

34 useful comments

A Reader has made 0 posts.

16 useful comments

Les Ellison has made 54 posts.

10 useful comments

Lyn Myers has made 5 posts.

8 useful comments

James Warwood has made 4 posts.

8 useful comments

Last updated: 24 mins ago